Review



custom frozen reference bmd panels  (Thermo Fisher)


Bioz Verified Symbol Thermo Fisher is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Thermo Fisher manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Thermo Fisher custom frozen reference bmd panels
    Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to <t>BMD,</t> all BCC isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for <t>each</t> <t>antimicrobial,</t> testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.
    Custom Frozen Reference Bmd Panels, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/custom+frozen+reference+bmd+panels/pmc11837569-181-13-20?v=Thermo+Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    custom frozen reference bmd panels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from people with and without cystic fibrosis"

    Article Title: Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from people with and without cystic fibrosis

    Journal: Journal of Clinical Microbiology

    doi: 10.1128/jcm.01480-24

    Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to BMD, all BCC isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for each antimicrobial, testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to BMD, all BCC isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for each antimicrobial, testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.

    Techniques Used: Comparison

    Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to BMD, CF vs non-CF isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for each antimicrobial, testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant, and values <0.05 are highlighted red in the table. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to BMD, CF vs non-CF isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for each antimicrobial, testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant, and values <0.05 are highlighted red in the table. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.

    Techniques Used: Comparison



    Similar Products

    custom frozen reference bmd panels  (Thermo Fisher)
    90
    Thermo Fisher custom frozen reference bmd panels
    Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to <t>BMD,</t> all BCC isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for <t>each</t> <t>antimicrobial,</t> testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.
    Custom Frozen Reference Bmd Panels, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/custom+frozen+reference+bmd+panels/pmc11837569-181-13-20?v=Thermo+Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    custom frozen reference bmd panels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to BMD, all BCC isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for each antimicrobial, testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.

    Journal: Journal of Clinical Microbiology

    Article Title: Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from people with and without cystic fibrosis

    doi: 10.1128/jcm.01480-24

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to BMD, all BCC isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for each antimicrobial, testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.

    Article Snippet: For CF isolates, testing was performed from June 2022 to December 2022 using custom frozen reference BMD panels prepared by ThermoFisher with the same antimicrobial dilution ranges as listed above.

    Techniques: Comparison

    Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to BMD, CF vs non-CF isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for each antimicrobial, testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant, and values <0.05 are highlighted red in the table. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.

    Journal: Journal of Clinical Microbiology

    Article Title: Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from people with and without cystic fibrosis

    doi: 10.1128/jcm.01480-24

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to BMD, CF vs non-CF isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for each antimicrobial, testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant, and values <0.05 are highlighted red in the table. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.

    Article Snippet: For CF isolates, testing was performed from June 2022 to December 2022 using custom frozen reference BMD panels prepared by ThermoFisher with the same antimicrobial dilution ranges as listed above.

    Techniques: Comparison